TL;DR
Scanlan, Tanis, and Lukabyo trace three national origin stories to a single finding: relationship building is the practice through which God has been understood to act in evangelical youth ministry for over a century.
Ask an evangelical youth worker why they do what they do and you will almost certainly hear something about relationships. Relationships with young people, relationships that model the love of Christ, relationships as the vehicle through which God works. What you are less likely to hear is where that conviction came from, who first practised it, or what assumptions it carries. Mark Scanlan, Gretchen Schoon Tanis, and Ruth Lukabyo set out to answer those questions by tracing the origins of three evangelical youth organisations across three countries. What they find is a shared theology that was never formally stated but was enacted from the very beginning, embedded in practices that shaped how evangelicals have worked with young people for over a century.
The article is a work of practical theology. Scanlan, based at St Mellitus College in London, brings archival research on the Crusaders' Union of Bible Classes (now Urban Saints), where he worked as an Area Development Worker from 1999 to 2002. Schoon Tanis, an independent researcher and former InterVarsity Fellowship staff worker in Australia, contributes the Australian IVF story. Lukabyo, at the Australian College of Theology, draws on her research into Young Life, in which she participated as a student, volunteer, and staff leader through the 1990s. Each author conducted their archival research independently before discovering shared themes through a period of group-based theological reflection, a process they liken to "writing the Body of Christ" (Graham et al.: 2019, chap. 4, cited in Scanlan et al.: 2025, 2). Their insider experience is disclosed openly through what they call an auto/theobiographical frame (Ward: 2008, 4, cited in Scanlan et al.: 2025, 2), a methodological honesty that strengthens rather than undermines the work.
The article's organising insight is that the pioneers of evangelical youth ministry "did not take time to formulate complex ideas that underpinned their practice, rather their ideas and theology can be seen as embodied first in practice, then established as accepted methods by future generations" (Scanlan et al.: 2025, 2). Drawing on Cameron et al.'s concept of the "operant theological voice" (Cameron et al.: 2010, 54–55, cited in Scanlan et al.: 2025, 2), they argue that studying historical practice reveals the implicit theology of these formative movements. The theology was not absent. It was relational, and it was enacted before anyone articulated it. From this foundation, the authors trace three shared "threads" of practice across the UK, Australia, and the United States: a focus on influential young people, charismatic lay leadership, and fun.
Targeting Influential Young People
The first thread concerns who these organisations built relationships with. The Crusaders' Union, formalised in 1906, adopted as a guiding principle that its classes "were aimed at the upper middle-class boys attending public and private schools" (Scanlan: 2017, 33, cited in Scanlan et al.: 2025, 5). The rationale was partly demographic: Sunday schools attracted working-class children, leaving middle and upper-class boys without a comparable ministry. But a more strategic logic also applied. Pete Ward has coined this the "grand strategy" of UK evangelicalism: approaching influential young people at the right time in order to gain "control of the future" (Ward: 1996, 45–62, cited in Scanlan et al.: 2025, 5). The aim was not only conversion but cultural influence, the hope that these boys would grow into evangelical leaders in politics, business, and church life.
Howard Guinness transplanted the same instinct to Australia. Arriving in 1930, he quickly pivoted from university ministry to elite independent schools, reasoning that these students "would become the movers and shakers, the leaders of the church, state, and business" (Lukabyo: 2020, 79, cited in Scanlan et al.: 2025, 6). He mentored gifted young men, invited students to accompany him as missioners, and spoke of "handing on the torch" (Guinness: 1978, 67, cited in Scanlan et al.: 2025, 6). Paul White, who became IVF General Secretary in 1943, formalised this approach by identifying what he called "Blokes Worth Watching," younger men with leadership potential in whom he invested personally (White: 1986, cited in Scanlan et al.: 2025, 6). The relational strategy was effective in training leaders, but the observation that "there were naturally those, often students from state-run schools, who felt excluded" (Scanlan et al.: 2025, 6) deserves more than a footnote. If relationship is the vehicle through which God acts — the article's central claim — then the question of whose relationships are cultivated is itself a theological question. The grand strategy carried an operant theology of belonging alongside its theology of influence: the most transformative relational investment was reserved for those already positioned to shape culture. Any constructive retrieval of this history needs to account for both.
Young Life arrived at the same place by a different road. Jim Rayburn compressed the instinct into a phrase — "winning the right to be heard" — and what is striking about this formulation is its transparency. Where Bevington and Guinness enacted the relational logic without theorising it, Rayburn named the sequence explicitly: earn trust, then speak. His targets were the "key kids," students whose social capital would draw their peers, but the direction of travel was reversed. Where Guinness extracted gifted young men from their ordinary contexts into formational spaces — house parties near the sea, elite schools reimagined as mission fields — Rayburn sent his leaders into students' worlds: football games, drive-in diners, school corridors. Andrew Root argues that this model set the template for global evangelical youth ministry for the following half century (Root: 2007, 53). That is probably right. But it also means that the question Rayburn's approach implicitly raises has been slow to surface: when you name relationship as the strategy, how long before it stops functioning as the theology?
What I find striking about this thread is the convergence. Three organisations, founded independently across three continents over four decades, arrived at the same strategic instinct: build relationships with influential young people and trust that influence will multiply. The authors are right to note that this thread carries a second-stage intention that goes beyond conversion to shaping wider culture. UK research cited later in the article shows that over 75% of young people from churched backgrounds cite peers as having a positive impact on their faith (Youthscape Centre for Research: 2022, cited in Scanlan et al.: 2025, 12). The founders' instinct that peer influence is the primary mechanism of faith formation turns out to be well supported by contemporary data, even if it remains theologically underdeveloped. But peer influence operates within communities, and communities have conditions of belonging. The grand strategy built those conditions around existing social capital. The question worth carrying forward is what a different architecture of belonging might look like — one that kept the peer formation mechanism while releasing it from the logic of cultural leverage.
Charismatic Lay Leadership Outside the Church
The second thread concerns who led these organisations and where they operated. In every case, the founders were lay people working outside institutional church structures. Herbert Bevington, the key multiplier of Crusaders' classes, launched new groups wherever his business took him. None sat within a local congregation or under denominational authority. By the time twelve classes formalised as the Crusaders' Union in 1906, Bevington had personally launched three and others had been started by boys from the original group (Scanlan: 2017, 30, cited in Scanlan et al.: 2025, 7). Over 250 classes emerged within thirty years through this multiplying lay leadership culture.
The Crusaders' identity became, as the authors put it, "something of an unacknowledged faith tradition, akin to a local church and denominational affiliation" (Scanlan et al.: 2025, 7). The strength of this identity is evidenced by remarkably consistent language spanning eighty years: the first paid General Secretary was described as "a Crusader to his fingertips," and in 2002, the Chair of Council resisted renaming the organisation because he "feel[s] 'Crusaders' down through [his] roots" (Scanlan: 2017, 39, cited in Scanlan et al.: 2025, 7). Relational connection to the organisation replaced denominational belonging.
Howard Guinness followed the same extra-ecclesial pattern. Converted at fourteen through a Crusaders' Bible class after a cricket game, he was nurtured entirely within parachurch organisations rather than a local church (Guinness: 1975, 21, cited in Scanlan et al.: 2025, 8). When he arrived in Sydney, he transplanted that formation culture wholesale. The article notes that "habitual churchgoers resented the religious enthusiasm which carried Sunday observance into weekday living" (Prince and Prince: 1979, 103, cited in Scanlan et al.: 2025, 8). In the United States, Jim Rayburn packed out mortuaries, hotel ballrooms, and living rooms with teenagers who came to hear him tell stories about Jesus, all deliberately outside church walls. Andrew Root argues that Rayburn and Young Life effectively invented the model of relational youth ministry that would set the frame of reference globally (Root: 2007, 53, cited in Scanlan et al.: 2025, 8).
The theological significance of lay leadership, the authors argue, is not merely organisational. Because these leaders operated outside institutional church structures, the places where relationships were formed became the locus of God's action. Formal church was secondary. Schoon Tanis extends this to suggest that relationships in youth ministry functioned as "an implicit sacramentality... replacing the more formal ecclesial sacraments" (Schoon Tanis: 2016, cited in Scanlan et al.: 2025, 9). This is a provocative claim, and I think the authors are wise to surface it even if they do not fully resolve it.
That dynamic has a longer history than this article surveys. In reviewing Christopher Ryan's account of Australian Catholic youth ministry, I found the same pattern: innovations pioneered by lay practitioners at the margins, resisted by institutional structures, then quietly absorbed once their effectiveness could no longer be denied. The movement runs consistently from parachurch to church, not the reverse. This is not a peculiarity of any one tradition or denomination. It looks more like a structural feature of how youth ministry actually develops — and naming it as such matters, because it raises a pointed question about the present: what is being pioneered at the margins right now that institutional churches have not yet recognised as their own future?
Fun as Theology
The third thread is fun. The authors are emphatic that fun in these origin stories was not peripheral but theologically significant. As a contemporary Urban Saints leader put it in an interview, "if you're not thinking fun, then you're not going to have any youth work!" (Scanlan: 2021, 152, cited in Scanlan et al.: 2025, 9). The theological claim is that creating enjoyable spaces presents young people with a vision of what life with God looks like. Or as the authors summarise, fun presents "a vision of God's work in their lives, that a life lived for and with Jesus Christ will be the most fulfilling life possible" (Scanlan et al.: 2025, 10).
The thread appears almost from the start with the Crusaders' Union, which proposed a summer camp in 1907, just seven years after Kestin's first Bible class. Camps, sports competitions, annual trips, and nationally organised events followed. During the Great Depression, the Australian Crusaders' Union camps advertised themselves as a "real holiday" and used fellowship and fun to "explode the idea that Christianity is something to be avoided" (Crusaders' Union Camp Brochure: 1979, cited in Scanlan et al.: 2025, 10). Howard Guinness believed that fun and community created the best context for deep conversations about faith, recounting a house party near the sea in Tasmania where a young woman arrived intending only to have a good time and discovered that "to be a Christian was the very essence of having a good time" (Guinness: 1978, 87, cited in Scanlan et al.: 2025, 10). Young Life built its entire identity around this conviction, with Rayburn's characteristic dictum: "Do you stop having fun when you start talking about Jesus? If you do, God help you" (Scanlan et al.: 2025, 4).
The authors trace how this practice became embedded in youth ministry theory. Doug Fields' model of moving young people from the "crowd" to the "core" (Fields: 1998, 211, cited in Scanlan et al.: 2025, 10) and Ward's vision for incarnational outreach that progresses from "contact" through "extended contact" to relationship and then gospel (Ward: 1998, 52–79, cited in Scanlan et al.: 2025, 10) both carry the DNA of these early organisations. Fun was the relational fuel, and it persists as a core practice precisely because it served both as an attraction strategy and as a bonding mechanism that made the organisation something young people belonged to, not merely attended.
There is a tension here that the article handles well. The Fields and Ward models, influential as they were through the 1990s, framed fun primarily as an attentional tool: attract young people with entertainment, then move them toward deeper engagement. Many practitioners today are looking for constructive ways to move past that entertainment-attraction trajectory toward something more theologically rich and relationally ordered. The authors' sabbath-space proposal offers one such alternative, reframing fun not as bait but as rest, a space where young people can experience restoration in an era of rising anxiety (citing Haidt: 2024, cited in Scanlan et al.: 2025, 12). I find this a genuinely helpful reframing. It recovers the theological substance of the founders' original claim, that the Christian life is the most fulfilling life, while redirecting it away from the competitive logic of entertainment. Other relationally present models of fun deserve consideration alongside it: shared adventure and pilgrimage (the camp tradition stripped of its programmatic scaffolding), communal celebration and feasting, hospitality as the creation of belonging spaces rather than attraction strategies, or even shared labour and service as contexts where enjoyment and formation happen together. The sabbath-space concept opens a door that the field would benefit from walking through more deliberately. But to walk through it requires connecting this thread — fun as vision of life with God — to the ones that preceded it: the peer formation that happens within communities of belonging, and the implicit sacramentality that lay leadership located outside institutional walls. A theology of play that holds those three threads together is a different and larger project than what Scanlan, Tanis, and Lukabyo set out to write. But the material for it is here.
Wider Influence and Future Possibilities
What the founders built outside the church, the church eventually came to inhabit. The article's final sections argue that these parachurch practices did not remain contained. Church-based youth ministry subsequently adopted parachurch methods, giving it "a parachurch ethos" (Scanlan et al.: 2025, 11). The authors draw a line from these origins to Fresh Expressions and other missional church innovations, suggesting that the extra-ecclesial impulse of early youth ministry prefigured what later generations would formalise as new forms of church.
Looking forward, the authors highlight the peer-influence data, with 75–85% of young people citing peers as a positive faith influence (Youthscape Centre for Research: 2022, cited in Scanlan et al.: 2025, 12), as a resource for future practice. Their sabbath-space proposal, discussed above, complements this by reframing the historical thread of fun for a generation facing rising anxiety. Both proposals are offered lightly rather than as fully developed arguments, but they point toward productive directions for further work.
Strengths
- The transnational comparison is the article's most distinctive contribution. Most youth ministry histories are confined to a single national context. Placing UK, Australian, and US origins alongside each other reveals shared instincts that no single-country study could surface, and the convergence of three independent archival projects on the same threads gives the findings credibility that a single-authored comparative study would struggle to achieve.
- The operant theology framework is generative. Rather than lamenting youth ministry's perceived theological thinness, the authors reframe the question: the theology was always present, embedded in practice. This opens up historical practice as a legitimate site of theological inquiry and gives the field a more productive starting point than the familiar call for practitioners to read more theology.
- The authors' transparency about their positionality is refreshing. Each discloses their personal history with the organisation they study, and the auto/theobiographical framing names the subjective dimension of the research rather than disguising it. In a field where insider knowledge is common but rarely acknowledged, this honesty builds trust.
- The historical detail is rich and well sourced. Kestin's drawing-room Bible class, Guinness's Harris Tweed sports coats, Rayburn's mortuary gatherings: these vivid details bring the origin stories to life and make the article genuinely enjoyable to read.
Limitations
- The scope is narrower than the title implies. Three Anglophone parachurch organisations from similar social contexts do not represent the full range of evangelical youth ministry's origins. No non-Western, Global South, or indigenous youth ministry movements are considered. The authors are transparent about this, but the unqualified reference to "origin stories" in the title risks suggesting a comprehensiveness the article does not deliver.
- The "grand strategy" is described but not deeply interrogated. The class exclusions and the gendered focus on boys and young men are noted as historical facts rather than subjects requiring sustained critical analysis. Given that the operant theology framework invites examination of what practices reveal about implicit assumptions, the theology of elite targeting deserves the same careful treatment as the theology of relationship building.
- The forward-looking proposals are suggestive but underdeveloped. The peer-influence data and the sabbath-space concept both read more as gestures toward future work than as contributions in their own right, and neither receives the kind of engagement that would allow practitioners to do much with them.
Verdict
Scanlan, Tanis, and Lukabyo have produced a genuinely useful article for anyone seeking to understand why evangelical youth ministry looks and feels the way it does. The relational core they identify, and the three threads through which it expresses itself, are convincingly documented across three national contexts. The operant theology framework gives the field a way to take its own history seriously as a theological resource rather than mere backstory — and to ask, as the authors largely do not, what the theology embedded in those practices assumed about who belonged and who did not.
What the field needs, and what this article's material makes possible, is a sustained theology of play within youth ministry — one that connects sabbath, joy, hospitality, shared adventure, and the embodied experience of belonging into a coherent account of why fun matters that does not depend on its usefulness as an attraction strategy. Such a theology would need to press the question the grand strategy never asked: belonging for whom? Peer faith formation, implicit sacramentality, and the vision of life with God that the founders embedded in their camps and house parties and mortuary gatherings are not three separate findings. They are three facets of a single theological claim about what Christian community makes possible when it is not organised primarily around cultural leverage. The historical thread is there. What remains is for someone to follow it forward.
Recommended for youth ministry practitioners, educators, and historians. Those working in Australian contexts will find the IVF material particularly valuable, as Lukabyo's archival research on the Sydney context remains underappreciated outside specialist circles. Read alongside Ward's Growing Up Evangelical for the UK dimension and Root's Revisiting Relational Youth Ministry for the theological questions the article raises but does not resolve.
Sources
Cameron, Helen, Deborah Bhatti, Catherine Duce, James Sweeney, and Clare Watkins. Talking about God in Practice: Theological Action Research and Practical Theology. London: SCM Press, 2010.
Fields, Doug. Purpose Driven Youth Ministry. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1998.
Graham, Elaine, Heather Walton, and Frances Ward. Theological Reflection: Methods. 2nd ed. London: SCM Press, 2019.
Guinness, Howard. Journey among Students. Sydney: Anglican Information Office, 1975.
Guinness, Howard. Doers of the Word. Sydney: Anglican Information Office, 1978.
Haidt, Jonathan. The Anxious Generation: How the Great Rewiring of Childhood Is Causing an Epidemic of Mental Illness. London: Allen Lane, 2024.
Lukabyo, Ruth. "Protestant Youth Ministry at the University of Sydney in the 1930s." Journal of Youth and Theology 15.1 (2020): 71–92.
Prince, John, and Moya Prince. Tuned in to Change: A History of the Australian Scripture Union. Sydney: Scripture Union, 1979.
Root, Andrew. Revisiting Relational Youth Ministry: From a Strategy of Influence to a Theology of Incarnation. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2007.
Ryan, Christopher. "A Brief History of Australian Catholic Youth Ministry—Part I." The Australasian Catholic Record 96.4 (2019): 431–44.
Ryan, Christopher. "A Brief History of Australian Catholic Youth Ministry—Part II." The Australasian Catholic Record 97.1 (2020): 30–44.
Scanlan, Mark. "The Influence of the Crusaders' Union of Bible Classes on Evangelical Youth Ministry." PhD diss., King's College London, 2017.
Scanlan, Mark. "The Influence of the Crusaders' Union on Contemporary Youth Ministry Practice." Pages 145–60 in Evangelical Youth Ministry. Edited by Andrew P. Rogers, Helen Collins, and Israel Oluwole Olofinjana. London: SPCK, 2021.
Scanlan, Mark, Gretchen Schoon Tanis, and Ruth Lukabyo. "Roots, Threads, and Possibilities: How Learning from Some Origin Stories of Evangelical Youth Ministry Can Help Navigate a Challenging Future." Religions 16.2 (2025): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16020101 (https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16020101).
Schoon Tanis, Gretchen. "Young Life and the Church: Theology in Practice." PhD diss., Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 2016.
Ward, Pete. Growing Up Evangelical: Youthwork and the Making of a Subculture. London: SPCK, 1996.
Ward, Pete. God at the Mall: Youth Ministry That Meets Kids Where They're At. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 1998.
Ward, Pete. Participation and Mediation: A Practical Theology for the Liquid Church. London: SCM Press, 2008.
White, Paul. Doers of the Word. Sydney: Anglican Information Office, 1986.
Youthscape Centre for Research. Losing Heart: The Church's Disconnection from Young People. Luton: Youthscape, 2022.
